The Seleucid Code [antikvár]

DEAR READERMy first book, called the Hungarian Calendar" in Hungary, was available for reading and studying as early as 2002. In that book I expressed my doubts about the correctness of traditional chronologyIt is my hypothesis that the beginning of the Julian calendar (its first day of introduction) is closer to us in time by 200 years than the official standpoint would have us beUeve. Consequently, the real number of years elapsed since its starting day has been inflated by 200 invented historical years, and these years are hiding somewhere within the inflated period of time.In 2004, in my next book on the subject, which was published as the English-Hungarian edition of the same Hungarian Calendar", I determined with a one-day exacmess the real starting date of the Julian calendar. In my opinion the Julian calendar actually started on January 1 of CE 154!Calendar for January 154 (Julian calendar)SunMonTUeWedThuFriSat12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031Phases of the moon: 9:C 17:0 24: 31Calendar generated on www.tlmeandclate com/calenclarLater on I published further books in order to prove the correctness of CE 154 as the real starting time of the Julian calendar. I hoped to get some response from the circles of academic science, but what I got was almost nothing.It does not seem to be widely known that in the creation of historical chronology the most important role was played by historical solar and lunar ecUpses. We can firmly accept that, in the absence of mathematics and astronomy, historical science would be a mess, so that the legendary geese of the Capitol could be placed next to the capitulation of Sedan. Academic science is also based firmly on the mathematical and astronomical method, and assures us that our chronology is in complete order, safe and sound as far back as for a period of 2800 years. (Accordingly, this is the way it is taught in school.)